
That started a debate between the both of us in regards to whether people who die from silicone pumping should be recognized at a TDOR event.
I argued NO, and here are my reasons why..

That's why the TDOR was created. To memorialize the dead, ensure we didn't forget those people who were violently taken from us basically because they were living their trans lives, begin building a historical record that it was happening, create an event that would attract media coverage about the issue and give our allies a way to support us.
The event quickly went international because we live on all inhabited continents on this planet and anti-trans hate and violence is an international human rights issue.
While silicone pumping and the cis and trans people who die from it is a problematic issue that I have covered on these electronic pages since 2006, the fact remains that unlike a murder, the person who dies from silicone pumping, knows the potential risks of pumping, knows that people have died because of it, but still chose to do so.
Silicone pumping deaths, like suicides, also generate their own media publicity, unlike trans murders.
A silicone pumping death shouldn't be elevated to TDOR list recognition. Just as with suicide deaths, they are a separate category from trans people being murdered for who they are, and it is what the Transgender Day of Remembrance needs to continue to focus on.
The TDOR does not need to 'evolve' as I was told in that conversation I had with this particular activist, it is executing what it was designed to do.
So why mess with the success of the TDOR or attempt to alter its Prime Directive?
So no, silicone pumping deaths do not need to be counted in TDOR stats, nor should they be recognized at a TDOR event now or into the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment