One of the things that mystifies me is why The Southern Poverty Law Center hasn't declared Trans Exterminationalist Radical Feminism as a hate group. Could it be because the rumor may be true that a TERF works for SPLC and squashes the subject every time it comes up in SPLC circles?
So if you think I being harsh when I call this group of rad fems Whyte Womyn Gone Wyld,
trans oppressors or wonder why I have zero tolerance for their hate speech, I've learned from my people's history that you can't ignore vanillacentric privileged rabid haters that loudly and repeatedly call for your extermination from the planet. You take them at their word they're serious
The TERF's have to be confronted, called out, and their crap exposed at every opportunity. They started the War on Transwomen back in the 70's, and we have no choice but to fight them tooth and nail and end it with victory on our terms.
And to borrow a line from former Sen. Trent Lott (R-MS),
“I’m a firm believer in feeding people their own words back to them, when it’s appropriate.”
Time to
feed their own words back to them on a platter. Bon appetit, TERF's.
And now...the Trans Exterminationalists
Gloria Steinem's five page transphobic scribblings from her 1983 book
Outrageous Acts and Everyday Rebellions which heavily cited Janice Raymond's waste of trees.
In other words, transsexuals are paying an extreme tribute to the
power of sex roles. In order to set their real human personalities free,
they surgically mutilate their own bodies...
Instead of serving more lifesaving but often less lucrative needs for
their surgical and hormone-therapy skills, some physicians are aiding
individuals who are desperately trying to conform to an unjust society.
It’s a small group of successful physicians she [Janice Raymond] names
‘the transsexual empire’
Here's the verbal grenade she launched at Renee Richards in 1977.
"At a minimum, it was a diversion from the widespread
problems of sexual inequality." She writes that, while she supports the
right of individuals to identify as they choose, she claims that, in
many cases, transsexuals "surgically mutilate their own bodies" in order
to conform to a gender role that is inexorably tied to physical body
parts. She concludes that "feminists are right to feel uncomfortable
about the need for and uses of transsexualism."
Julie Bindel, who in a delicious piece of irony is now being hated on by the TERF's she was in lock step with.
"Those who ‘transition' seem to become stereotypical
in their appearance — f**k-me shoes and birds' nest hair for the boys;
beards, muscles and tattoos for the girls. Think about a world inhabited
just by transsexuals. It would look like the set of Grease."
Gender
dysphoria (GD) was invented in the 1950s by reactionary male
psychiatrists in an era when men were men and women were doormats. It is
a term used to describe someone who feels strongly that they should
belong to the opposite sex and that they were born in the wrong body. GD
has no proven genetic or physiological basis.
Germaine Greer (which is why
she got glitterbombed )
Nowadays we are all likely to meet
people who think they are women, have women’s names, and feminine
clothes and lots of eyeshadow, who seem to us to be some kind of ghastly
parody, though it isn’t polite to say so. We pretend that all the
people passing for female really are. Other delusions may be challenged,
but not a man’s delusion that he is female.
From
Pantomime Dames
"The only way a man can get rid of healthy genitals is to
say that he is convinced that he is a woman. Then another man will remove them
and gladly. In order to justify sex-change surgery a new disorder called gender
dysphoria has come into being. The disease has no biological marker; its
presence is discerned by a history of inappropriately gendered behaviour, social
disability and affective disorder. . . .
Governments that consist of very few women have hurried to
recognize as women men who believe that they are women and have had themselves
castrated to prove it, because they see women not as another sex but as a
non-sex. No so-called sex-change has ever begged for a uterus-and-ovaries
transplant; if uterus-and-ovaries transplants were made mandatory for wannabe
women they would disappear overnight. The insistence that manmade women be
accepted as women is the institutional expression of the mistaken conviction
that women are defective males. The biological truth is the opposite; all
biologists know that males are defective females. Though external genitalia are
the expression of the chromosomal defect, their removal will not alter the
chromosomal fact, any more than removal of the tails of puppies will produce a
tailless breed. "Sex-change operations" can only be carried out in Swift's
Laputa. As Dwight D. Billings and Robert Urban argued in 1982:
Transsexualism is a relational process sustained in medical
practice and marketed in public testimony ... The legitimization,
rationalization and commodification of sex-change operations have produced an
identity category transsexual for a diverse group of sexual deviants and victims
of severe gender role distress.
As sufferers from gender role distress themselves, women
must sympathize with transsexuals but a feminist must argue that the treatment
for gender role distress is not mutilation of the sufferer but radical change of
gender roles. Throughout their history women who could not carry out their
prescribed gender roles have suffered all kinds of ghastly gynecological
procedures and, like transsexuals, they have been grateful to their abusers.
Women could hardly now condone the elaborate mutilations practised on
individuals of both sexes, even though the victims argue that such mutilations
are their right.
Sex-change surgery is profoundly conservative in that it
reinforces sharply contrasting gender roles by shaping individuals to fit them.
. . .
No one ever asked women if they recognized sex-change males
as belonging to their sex or considered whether being obliged to accept MTF
transsexuals as women was at all damaging to their identity or self-esteem. As
far as anyone could tell, women did not mind calling sex-change males "she."
Perhaps this development should have been resisted, because it was part of the
definition of the female as "other," as simply the "not-male." Femaleness is not
the other side of the Rorschach blot of maleness, but a sex of its own, with a
sexuality of its own and a whole spectrum of possible expressions, many of which
take no account of maleness at all. Woman is not placed on earth for the use of
man any more than men are placed on earth for the use of women. Both could do
without each other if it were not for the pesky business of sexual reproduction.
. . .
A good-hearted woman is not supposed to mind that her sex
is the catch-all for all cases of gender ambiguity, but her tolerance of
spurious femaleness, her consent to treat it as if it is the same as her own
gender identity weakens her claim to have a sex of her own and tacitly supports
the Freudian stereotype of women as incomplete beings defined by their lack of a
penis. Women's lack of choosiness about who may be called a woman strengthens
the impression that women do not see their sex as quite real, and suggests that
perhaps they too identify themselves as the not-male, the other, any other.
. .
.
The transsexual is identified as such solely on his/her own
script, which can be as learned as any sex-typed behavior and as editorialized
as autobiographies usually are. The lack of insight that MTF transsexuals
usually show about the extent of their acceptance as females should be an
indication that their behavior is less rational than it seems. There is a
witness to the transsexual's script, a witness who is never consulted. She is
the person who built the transsexual's body of her own flesh and brought it up
as her son or daughter, the transsexual's worst enemy, his/her mother.
Whatever else it is gender reassignment is an exorcism of the mother. When a
man decides to spend his life impersonating his mother (like Norman Bates in
Psycho) it is as if he murders her and gets away with it, proving at a stroke
that there was nothing to her. His intentions are no more honourable than any
female impersonator's; his achievement is to gag all those who would call his
bluff. When he forces his way into the few private spaces women may enjoy and
shouts down their objections, and bombards the women who will not accept him
with threats and hate mail, he does as rapists have always done."
Ever wondered what would happen if you tried to hold an international trans hate conference and nobody wanted to host it? 
FYI TERF's, in Britain there's a law on the books called the 2010 Equality Act of which transpeeps are a protected class. 
If you're wondering why this issue between girls like us and the Michigan Womyn's Music Festival keep popping up repeatedly, it's time for another trans history moment.