TransGriot Nuke A Troll 8-Race Still Matters

The USS Monica is having to leave home port again and train her troll nuke tipped informational Tomahawks on the latest detractor who had a problem with one of my posts.

My Gabriel Aubry post  is the one that pissed this person off, and true to form, they refused to put their name on their long winded diatribe.      

Here's the comment  from  @multiracialweek

The author of this article is ignorant. And if what is being said about Gabriel Aubry is true he is ignorant too. First of all Halle and Gabriel's daughter is multiracial, not just Black and not just White. Secondly the One Drop Rule was abolished in 1967. While it may still be embraced by persons particularly in the African American community, we as Multiracial/Biracial persons have come a long way.

In addition it does not matter how society views Multiracial persons. They can view us as just Black, just Latino or just Asian however, society does NOT define us. We are not waiting on the White man or Black man's seal of approval to accept us as Multiracial. We define ourselves because we have the right to because it is our life. Society also views African Americans as being n******, ghetto, poor, lazy, etc. etc., and Latinos for being lazy, having multiple babies and for being illegal immigrants, but are these stereotypes true? NO. So therefore just because "society" views us as only one race does not mean it is true. It is interesting how you can reject racial stereotypes, and other forms of discrimination but people like you cannot seem to let go of the One Drop Rule, which is also discriminatory and racist. We are not stating we are multiracial or biracial to deny any part of our heritage but rather to embrace all of it. You can say that all Black people are mixed, if that is the case then why don't every Black person refer to themselves as multiracial? We are sick and tired of African Americans like you that keep referencing to the One Drop Rule which was created by a racist White person to attempt and hold multiracial persons back from our true heritage. We are not denying or attempting to deny our Black heritage. We love it. BUT we also love our Irish, Italian, German, Latino, Asian etc. as well. Get a clue, and get educated about multiracial/biracial persons, and recognize that we are here and will continue to proclaim ALL of our heritage regardless of whom has a problem with it.

5...4...3...2...1

First sign of a losing argument....demonize the messenger.

First who are you calling ignorant...the person at TMZ or the TransGriot?    You didn't make that clear.   


You're ignorant too...  You're ignorant of history and what the hell has been going on DESPITE your efforts to forcefully self identify as biracial and get biracial folks to claim all their heritage.   You want to ignore the fact that you are battling 400 years of slavery based negativity and the fact much of what happens in America still hinges on skin color.

Keep jousting at those societal racial windmills, Don Quixote   You can hate on me all you want and point fingers, but I'm just keeping it real on the state of race relations in this country.  It's people like you who have failed to deal with the reality of race and race relations and haven't bought a vowel and gotten a clue that we're a long way from singing kumbaya on race in the USA. .

And obviously the race of his daughter mattered to Gabriel Aubry because he wouldn't have complained or demanded media retractions about people considering Nahla black if he didn't feel there was something 'wrong' with his daughter being considered Black.

We didn't come up with the 'One Drop Rule'.  White people did because they were running around in the slave quarters late at night and had to deal with the conundrum of what to do about the kids that were conceived.  White people codified it into law.

I didn't get and still don't get the luxury of ignoring race.  I was born in 1962 in a segregated hospital, matriculated in a school district that was desegregating 'with all deliberate speed' starting in 1967, the year Loving v. Virgina went down and grew up in all Black neighborhoods.  Race smacked me in the face every day even when I didn't want to deal with it.  

When the Tea Klux Klan was protesting our biracial president last summer during the health care debate, they didn't aim their bigoted signs at the white half of his heritage.  Nope, all the signs I saw disrespected the Black half.

When Mr. Cablinasian stopped winning major golf tournaments and got caught up in a major sex scandal that ended his marriage to his Swedish wife, suddenly he was Black again.

.The 'one drop rule' may have gone down legislatively as a result of of Loving v. Virginia, but it still endures culturally and permeates every facet of it.

And I call bull feces on your claim that biracial people aren't doing it to run away from their African heritage.   Eldrick Woods comes to mind in that regard.   I  have seen more than a few biracial peeps run like Flo Jo and Usain Bolt away from the African roots, which makes me love biracial people like Halle Berry and Alicia Keys.even more when they publicly embrace their Black side.

Black people may be mixed culturally and genetically, but a white supremacist dominated society has told us otherwise.   A society dominated by 'whiteness' lets biracial kids with a Black parent know instantly what team they play on, especially if they've got an abundance of melanin in their skin. 

Until 'whiteness' and 'white supremacy' are destroyed in this country, it isn't driving societal policy and how societal power is distributed you can scream, rant and rave you're biracial all you want, American society however as constituted is still going to demand you pick a side whether you want to or not.   That's especially true if your skin tone puts you on the 'non-white' scale of things despite coming out of the birth canal of a white woman or being fathered by a white male..

And that's keeping it real for you.

Thanks for playing, I have as a parting gift of Stevie Wonder's song 'Ebony and Ivory'  for you..

Oh yeah, duck and cover and don't look at the flash.

TransGriot Nuke A Troll 7-Southern Fried Fool

Well, since the countdown to the 150th anniversary of the War To Perpetuate Slavery was already jumped off by a December 20 Charleston SC ball marking the 150th anniversary of South Carolina's secession from the union,  the Southern revisionists have been working overtime trying to 'convince' me and other people that slavery wasn't the primary cause of the war.

Yeah, right.

It's time for the USS Monica to leave home port, cruise the cyber ocean and launch another 50 megatons of knowledge at some poor deluded fool or fools.

This time the rhetorical troll nuke tipped Tomahawks are aimed at someone calling themselves 'native confederate'.who tried to post Southern fried spin on a post I wrote stating the Civil War WAS about slavery

I am a native american i know the civil war was based on many things but never was it based on slavery i reenact the civil war and i where grey there was indians in the confederacy cherokee, choctaw, Lumbee, chicasaw and the last confederate general is general Stand Watie and he was a cherokee chief of the chorkee tribe. The civil war was based on state rights, freedom, lands and you think the union is good for how they forced us on the reservation.

Rhetorical Tomahawks spooling up.  Board is green.   Begin countdown   5...4...3...2..1  launch.


BULLSHIT.    The only thing consistently mentioned in the Declarations of Secession for all the CSA member states is slavery.

Let me spell it out for you so you can comprehend that point.   The major reason why the South seceded from the Union and instigated a treasonous war against the United States government was S-L-A-V-E-R-Y.

In this piece by Professor John Tures, he notes in the four state declarations that are available to peruse, the word “slave” appears a combined 82 times.  The CSA states even refer to themselves as “Slave-Holding States.”

The 'state's rights' term y'all like to pimp or any variation of it such as “State’s rights,” “states’ rights” or “states rights” do not appear in any of the four secession declarations.  The word “rights” appears 14 times and “right” appears 32 times according to Professor Tures, but many of these references involve “the right to own slaves.” 


You southern revisionists seem to continually ignore the Declarations of the Cause of Secession, the Cornerstone Speech of Confederate Vice President Alexander Stephens, and the recorded statements of many Southern politicians of the time that consistently stated across the board they were fighting to preserve slavery.

'Slavery was without question the occasion of secession'.   Confederate VP Alexander Stephens.    He repeated it twenty years later.

William Preston of South Carolina stated at the Democratic Convention in 1860 that  “Slavery is our King; slavery is our Truth; slavery is our Divine Right.”

Edward Bryan of South Carolina in his run for the governor's chair in 1860 stated, “Give us slavery or give us death!”

Confederate President Jefferson Davis, in an April 1861 address to the Confederate Congress said as part of that speech:    

“a persistent and organized system of hostile measures against the rights of the owners of slaves in the Southern States” had culminated in a political party dedicated to “annihilating in effect property worth thousands of dollars.” Since “the labor of African slaves was and is indispensable” to the South’s production of cotton, rice, sugar, and tobacco, “the people of the Southern States were driven by the conduct of the North to the adoption of some course of action to avert the danger with which they were openly menaced.”

'We went to war on account of the thing we quarreled with the North about.   I never heard of any other cause of quarrel than slavery.   John Mosby, Confederate guerrilla 


It was only after it was clear they were going to lose the war they jumped off in 1861 did they start the revisionist history campaign to try to paint their racist reason for starting the War To Perpetuate Slavery into 'The Lost Cause'. 

Historians ain't buying what you're trying to sell. 

As for the second comment he posted:

look up General Stand Watie i am historicaly correct about him. He was was the
General of the Trans Mississippi indian calvery. 

So?   Doesn't change the fact the Civil War was about slavery.   The bottom line is that anybody who fought for the South, including Stand Waite, was a traitor to the United States who was on the wrong side of the constitutional argument, morality and history.

The people who put on those gray uniforms may have fought gallantly, ably and well, but they don't get a pass.for that. They still chose to back a rebellious group of states, planters, and ambitious politicians who instigated the ruinous War To Perpetuate Slavery.
 
600,000 Americans died simply because the Southern planter class wanted to keep making money, keep from doing any manual labor, keep slavery alive by any means necessary because they saw the anti-slavery societal handwriting on the wall and keep my ancestors in chains.

Duck and cover, and don't look at the flash when the nuke explodes.

\n"; } -->

\n"; } -->

\n"; } -->

\n"; } -->

\n"; } -->

\n"; document.getElementById('resselect').value=zoomres; } -->